Comparison

ScraperAPI alternative: ReefAPI vs ScraperAPI

ScraperAPI alternative: ReefAPI is a ScraperAPI alternative when your target maps to a supported engine and you want normalized JSON, not HTML. ScraperAPI is the better choice when you need to fetch arbitrary public URLs at scale with your own parsers and control over proxies and rendering.

vs ScraperAPI3 ReefAPI enginesOne key · one credit poolFree tier
Table

ReefAPI vs ScraperAPI

DimensionReefAPIScraperAPIBest fit
Product modelReady-made, source-specific endpoints. You call an engine and get parsed data for that source.You pass a URL and get back HTML. ScraperAPI rotates proxies, retries and can render JavaScript, plus structured endpoints for a few sources like Amazon and Google.Depends
Output you getStructured data in the same { ok, data, meta, error } JSON envelope on every endpoint.Raw page HTML for most targets, so you write and maintain the parsers yourself.ReefAPI
Pricing modelOne shared credit pool across every engine.Subscription by API credits per month, with concurrency set by plan; JavaScript rendering and premium or residential proxies consume extra credits.ReefAPI
Free tier1,000 credits on signup, no card.A free trial with a monthly credit allowance; verify the current amount on ScraperAPI.Depends
Failed or blocked callsNot charged — failed or blocked ReefAPI calls are not charged, except verified SHEIN NOT_FOUND on product/detail and price (4 credits).ScraperAPI bills successful requests and absorbs failed proxy attempts for you.Depends
What you manageNothing; the engine owns parsing, proxies and anti-bot.You choose rendering and proxy options per request and maintain parsers for each site's HTML.ReefAPI
Best fitSupported sources you want as clean JSON.Arbitrary public URLs at scale, where you already own the parsers.Alternative
Pricing

What each side actually charges

Both columns are published prices, not quotes. Ours are generated from the same plan file the checkout charges against, so they cannot drift from what you would pay. ScraperAPI’s were read off ScraperAPI’s own pricing page on and are reproduced with their plan names and their units. Prices change; check the linked page before you commit.

Read this before comparing the two tables

🔴 The credit multiplier is the whole story and the headline quota hides it. A plain request is 1 credit, but e-commerce targets such as Amazon, Walmart and eBay are 5, search engines are 25, LinkedIn is 30, JavaScript rendering is 10, premium proxies are 10, ultra-premium is 30, and premium plus rendering is 25 — with a further +10 when bot protection has to be cleared. So the Hobby plan's 100,000 credits is 100,000 plain pages, but only 4,000 Google searches or 3,333 LinkedIn pages. Our credits do not move with how hard the target is: a blocked site costs the same as an open one.

ReefAPI — published plans
PlanPriceIncludedPer 1,000 credits
Free$01,000 credits at signup, no card—
Pro$15 / mo10,000 credits / mo$1.50
Ultra$50 / mo50,000 credits / mo$1.00
Mega$100 / mo125,000 credits / mo$0.80
Enterprise$200 / mo300,000 credits / mo$0.67
ScraperAPI — published plans
PlanPriceIncluded
Free$01,000 API credits on the free plan at 5 concurrent connections, plus a separate 7-day trial with 5,000 API credits and no card required.
Hobby$49 / mo100,000 API credits / mo — 20 threads; 10% off billed yearly
Startup$149 / mo1,000,000 API credits / mo — 50 threads
Business$299 / mo3,000,000 API credits / mo — 100 threads
Scaling$475 / mo5,000,000 API credits / mo — 200 threads
Professional$975 / mo10,500,000 API credits / mo — 300 threads
EnterpriseNot published22,000,000+ API credits — contact sales; the pay-as-you-go overage rate is referenced but never priced
ReefAPI, in one line

$0.67–$1.50 / 1,000 credits on monthly billing, or $0.33–$0.75 / 1,000 credits paid yearly (−50%). Credits roll over and never expire, and every engine draws from the same balance. Failed calls are free except verified SHEIN NOT_FOUND on product/detail and price (4 credits). Credits are not requests: measured across 1,124 catalog actions on 2026-08-25, 67% cost one credit, 18% cost two and 5% cost three.

Does ScraperAPI charge for failed or blocked calls?

Not charged. Their documentation states "We only charge for successful requests (200 and 404 status codes)." One difference from us: their credits do not roll over — the balance resets when the subscription renews. Ours never expire.

Where ScraperAPI beats us

On plain, unprotected pages they are cheaper than us and by a wide margin: Hobby at $49 for 100,000 one-credit requests is $0.49 per 1,000, against $0.67 to $1.50 per 1,000 credits on our monthly plans. Their free plan also renews rather than being a one-off, and there is a 7-day 5,000-credit trial on top. And their product fetches any URL, where ours only covers sources we have built an engine for.

ScraperAPI prices read from scraperapi.com/pricing on . ReefAPI prices from reefapi.com/pricing, generated at build time.

Pick ReefAPI

When ReefAPI is the better fit

  • Your target is covered by a ReefAPI engine and you want normalized JSON instead of building parsers.
  • You want commerce, search and other endpoints under one account and one credit pool.
  • You want timeout and blocked calls to be free and MCP access for AI agents.
Pick ScraperAPI

When the alternative is better

  • You need to fetch arbitrary public pages by URL and control proxies and JavaScript rendering.
  • You already have parsers and only need scraping infrastructure at scale.
  • Your targets are not in ReefAPI's supported engine list.
Proof point

Real ReefAPI snapshot

ReefAPI captured this live web-extract example on . It is committed in the SEO snapshot store and used as page evidence, not generated copy.

Captured request
{
  "method": "POST",
  "url": "https://api.reefapi.com/web-extract/v1/scrape",
  "headers": {
    "x-api-key": "$REEF_KEY",
    "content-type": "application/json"
  },
  "body": {
    "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "formats": [
      "markdown",
      "metadata"
    ]
  }
}
Captured response excerpt
{
  "ok": true,
  "meta": {
    "api": "web-extract",
    "endpoint": "scrape",
    "mode": "live",
    "latency_ms": 580.8,
    "record_count": 1,
    "bytes": 235941,
    "cache_hit": false,
    "browserless": true,
    "ssrf_guarded": true,
    "final_url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "formats": [
      "markdown",
      "metadata"
    ],
    "extraction_method": "trafilatura"
  },
  "data": {
    "final_url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "title": "Web scraping - Wikipedia",
    "metadata": {
      "title": "Web scraping - Wikipedia",
      "description": null,
      "canonical": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
      "lang": "en",
      "site_name": "Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.",
      "author": "Contributors to Wikimedia projects",
      "published_at": "2005-09-17T18:57:30Z",
      "modified_at": null,
      "section": null,
      "keywords": [],
      "favicon": "https://en.wikipedia.org/static/apple-touch/wikipedia.png",
      "og": {
        "title": "Web scraping - Wikipedia",
        "type": "website"
      }
    },
    "extraction": {
      "method": "trafilatura",
      "rendered": false,
      "confidence": "high",
      "content_chars": 25849
    },
    "markdown": "**Web scraping**, **web harvesting**, or **web data extraction** is [data scraping](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_scraping) used for [extracting data](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_extraction) from [websites](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website).<sup>[\\[1\\]](https://en.wikipedia.org#cite_note-1)</sup> Web scraping software may directly access the [World Wide Web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web) using the [Hypertext Transfer Protocol](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertext_Transfer_Protocol) or a web browser. While web scraping can be done manually by a software user,"
  }
}
Measured

What we found when we called our own endpoints

Every comparison page on the internet will tell you its own product is good. These are numbers we got by calling ReefAPI and writing down what came back, including where the answer went against us. Each one is dated and each one is repeatable against the same endpoint.

walmartmeasured

What a wide search really costs, stated plainly because the badge understates it

search is billed per ROW at two credits each with a floor of two, so 20 rows is 40 credits and 164 rows is 328. That is by far the most expensive read in this batch and the endpoint badge does not show it, because the badge shows the unit price. product_detail and category are flat at 2; reviews are 1 credit per 20 rows with a floor of 2. Sweep rarely, enrich often.

yelpmeasured

The response carries its own completeness score, including when the score is bad

500 rows against a reported 8,945 is 5.6%, and completeness_pct is in every result rather than left for you to work out. No strategy we measured gets a heavily-reviewed business anywhere near whole. We would rather publish 5.6% on a sales page than let you find it in production.

amazonmeasured

gtin-to-asin takes the upc, not the gtin

product/detail prints gtin, upc, ean, isbn and a barcodes array. Feeding the 14-digit gtin back into gtin-to-asin returned zero matches on two different products; feeding the 12-digit upc out of the same response returned the correct ASIN as the first match, both times. Use upc for the round trip. That is the kind of detail that costs an afternoon if nobody writes it down.

FAQ

Questions developers ask before switching

Is ReefAPI a ScraperAPI alternative?

For supported sources, yes: ReefAPI returns parsed JSON so you skip the HTML-parsing step. ScraperAPI is the better fit when you need to fetch arbitrary URLs and are happy owning the parsing.

Does ReefAPI return HTML like ScraperAPI?

Not by default. ScraperAPI's core mode returns page HTML you parse yourself; ReefAPI's engines return already-structured data. ReefAPI's Web Extract engine covers general page extraction when you need it.

How does credit billing compare?

ScraperAPI charges API credits per request, with JavaScript rendering and premium proxies costing more credits. ReefAPI draws every engine from one shared credit pool and does not charge for failed or blocked calls except verified SHEIN NOT_FOUND on product/detail and price (4 credits). Exact rates change, so check each provider for current numbers.

Method

Source notes and hedges

Competitor pricing, quotas, free tiers and feature limits change. This page uses official public pages for product-positioning claims and keeps unstable commercial details general.

Start building

Try the relevant ReefAPI endpoints with 1,000 free credits, or open the docs to inspect params, examples and live proof before wiring them into production.