Comparison

Zyte alternative: ReefAPI vs Zyte

Zyte alternative: ReefAPI is a Zyte alternative when you need supported sources as ready-made REST APIs. Zyte is the better choice when you need full-stack scraping — unblocking, rendering and automatic extraction — for arbitrary websites.

vs Zyte3 ReefAPI enginesOne key · one credit poolFree tier
Table

ReefAPI vs Zyte

DimensionReefAPIZyteBest fit
Product modelReady-made, source-specific endpoints that return parsed data.Zyte API bundles proxy handling, unblocking, browser rendering and automatic extraction behind one request, aimed at arbitrary sites.Depends
Extraction approachEach engine parses its own source to a stable schema.Automatic AI extraction can turn many pages (articles, products) into structured data without per-site parsers.Alternative
Pricing modelOne shared credit pool across every engine.Usage-based, where cost varies with the features a request uses (proxy tier, rendering, extraction). Verify current pricing on Zyte.ReefAPI
Failed or blocked callsNot charged — failed or blocked ReefAPI calls are not charged, except verified SHEIN NOT_FOUND on product/detail and price (4 credits).Billed by successful request and the features consumed; check Zyte's current terms.ReefAPI
What you manageNothing; the engine owns parsing, proxies and anti-bot.You choose request features — HTTP vs proxy mode, browser automation, extraction — per target.ReefAPI
Best fitSupported public sources as productized APIs.Arbitrary-site unblocking, rendering and automatic extraction at scale.Alternative
Pricing

What each side actually charges

Both columns are published prices, not quotes. Ours are generated from the same plan file the checkout charges against, so they cannot drift from what you would pay. Zyte’s were read off Zyte’s own pricing page on and are reproduced with their plan names and their units. Prices change; check the linked page before you commit.

Read this before comparing the two tables

🔴 Zyte's headline of from $0.06 per 1,000 successful responses is the single cheapest cell in a forty-cell matrix — a tier-1 site, fetched as an HTTP body, at a $500-a-month commitment. The same product at the other corner, a tier-5 site rendered in a browser at pay-as-you-go, is $16.08 per 1,000. That is a 268-fold spread, and Zyte assigns the difficulty tier automatically: you cannot pick it. Any comparison that quotes one Zyte number without naming the tier and the commitment is misleading, including one that quotes it in our favour.

ReefAPI — published plans
PlanPriceIncludedPer 1,000 credits
Free$01,000 credits at signup, no card—
Pro$15 / mo10,000 credits / mo$1.50
Ultra$50 / mo50,000 credits / mo$1.00
Mega$100 / mo125,000 credits / mo$0.80
Enterprise$200 / mo300,000 credits / mo$0.67
Zyte — published plans
PlanPriceIncluded
Free$0$5 of free credit for the first billing month, no commitment, 30 days to use it. Whether a card is required is not stated.
Pay as you go$0 commitmentHTTP responses $0.13 to $1.27 per 1,000 — browser-rendered $1.01 to $16.08 per 1,000, depending on the difficulty tier
$100 / mo commitment$100 / moHTTP $0.10 to $0.95 per 1,000 — browser-rendered $0.75 to $12.00 per 1,000
$200 / mo commitment$200 / moHTTP $0.08 to $0.76 per 1,000 — browser-rendered $0.60 to $9.60 per 1,000
$500 / mo commitment$500 / moHTTP $0.06 to $0.61 per 1,000 — browser-rendered $0.48 to $7.68 per 1,000
EnterpriseNot publishedFurther volume discounts, contact sales
Add-ons$0.0004 to $0.0016 per data typeAutomatic extraction — screenshots $0.002 each
ReefAPI, in one line

$0.67–$1.50 / 1,000 credits on monthly billing, or $0.33–$0.75 / 1,000 credits paid yearly (−50%). Credits roll over and never expire, and every engine draws from the same balance. Failed calls are free except verified SHEIN NOT_FOUND on product/detail and price (4 credits). Credits are not requests: measured across 1,124 catalog actions on 2026-08-25, 67% cost one credit, 18% cost two and 5% cost three.

Does Zyte charge for failed or blocked calls?

Not charged. Their page states "You are only charged for successful responses. Rate-limiting and unsuccessful responses are free." ReefAPI also leaves operational failures free; verified SHEIN NOT_FOUND on product/detail and price costs 4 credits. They also publish no overage penalty: exceeding your commitment is charged at your existing discounted rate.

Where Zyte beats us

For easy targets Zyte is dramatically cheaper than us — $0.06 to $0.13 per 1,000 HTTP responses against $0.67 to $1.50 per 1,000 credits on our monthly plans — and their pay-as-you-go entry needs no subscription at all. They also fetch any URL rather than only sources we have built for. Where the comparison turns is the hard end, and it turns on their own published numbers: a tier-5 site rendered in a browser runs $7.68 to $16.08 per 1,000 on their matrix, while a ReefAPI credit costs the same whether the target was open or fought back.

Zyte prices read from zyte.com/pricing on . ReefAPI prices from reefapi.com/pricing, generated at build time.

Pick ReefAPI

When ReefAPI is the better fit

  • You want supported public data sources as productized REST APIs.
  • You want one credit pool and no charge for timeout or blocked calls.
  • You are feeding live data into AI assistants through MCP.
Pick Zyte

When the alternative is better

  • You need unblocking and automatic extraction for arbitrary websites.
  • You want proxy mode or browser automation as part of one scraping request.
Proof point

Real ReefAPI snapshot

ReefAPI captured this live web-extract example on . It is committed in the SEO snapshot store and used as page evidence, not generated copy.

Captured request
{
  "method": "POST",
  "url": "https://api.reefapi.com/web-extract/v1/scrape",
  "headers": {
    "x-api-key": "$REEF_KEY",
    "content-type": "application/json"
  },
  "body": {
    "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "formats": [
      "markdown",
      "metadata"
    ]
  }
}
Captured response excerpt
{
  "ok": true,
  "meta": {
    "api": "web-extract",
    "endpoint": "scrape",
    "mode": "live",
    "latency_ms": 580.8,
    "record_count": 1,
    "bytes": 235941,
    "cache_hit": false,
    "browserless": true,
    "ssrf_guarded": true,
    "final_url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "formats": [
      "markdown",
      "metadata"
    ],
    "extraction_method": "trafilatura"
  },
  "data": {
    "final_url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
    "title": "Web scraping - Wikipedia",
    "metadata": {
      "title": "Web scraping - Wikipedia",
      "description": null,
      "canonical": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_scraping",
      "lang": "en",
      "site_name": "Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.",
      "author": "Contributors to Wikimedia projects",
      "published_at": "2005-09-17T18:57:30Z",
      "modified_at": null,
      "section": null,
      "keywords": [],
      "favicon": "https://en.wikipedia.org/static/apple-touch/wikipedia.png",
      "og": {
        "title": "Web scraping - Wikipedia",
        "type": "website"
      }
    },
    "extraction": {
      "method": "trafilatura",
      "rendered": false,
      "confidence": "high",
      "content_chars": 25849
    },
    "markdown": "**Web scraping**, **web harvesting**, or **web data extraction** is [data scraping](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_scraping) used for [extracting data](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_extraction) from [websites](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website).<sup>[\\[1\\]](https://en.wikipedia.org#cite_note-1)</sup> Web scraping software may directly access the [World Wide Web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web) using the [Hypertext Transfer Protocol](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertext_Transfer_Protocol) or a web browser. While web scraping can be done manually by a software user,"
  }
}
Measured

What we found when we called our own endpoints

Every comparison page on the internet will tell you its own product is good. These are numbers we got by calling ReefAPI and writing down what came back, including where the answer went against us. Each one is dated and each one is repeatable against the same endpoint.

indeedmeasured

The United Kingdom site refused us on both attempts, and neither call was charged

Two separate calls to the UK site, each about half a minute, both came back TARGET_BLOCKED. The US, German, Indian and Japanese sites all answered in one to two seconds the same afternoon. The country list has sixty-odd entries and we measured five of them. Two things follow: measure the country you actually need before you commit to it, and note that a blocked call cost nothing — which is why our per-call price does not move with how hard the target is.

fiverrmeasured

A reported total is not a reachable total, and we print the ceiling

One popular query reported between 175,556 and 193,895 gigs, the number moving across four calls in the same afternoon — which is how you know it is an estimate rather than a count. Paging told a different story: offset 0 with limit 96 returned 96 rows, offset 96 returned 14 more, and offsets 192, 288, 384 and 456 each returned zero with stop_reason page_cap. About 110 rows are reachable per query against a claimed 190,000. Treat each query as a sample of roughly a hundred and get breadth from more queries, not deeper paging.

zillowmeasured

Zillow will tell you a home sold and when, but not for how much

Against us, and the first thing anyone building comps will check. status=sold returned 41 rows in Austin and 41 in Seattle with sold_date on every one and sold_price_usd null on every one. Opening those zpids with property_detail did not rescue it: list price came back 0, last_sold_price_usd null, price_history an empty array. For the figure, use another source — Redfin's sold search returned a price on every row in the same city, and we say so on our own page rather than letting you discover it.

FAQ

Questions developers ask before switching

Is ReefAPI a Zyte alternative?

For supported sources, yes: ReefAPI hands you parsed JSON with no scraping request to assemble. Zyte is the better fit when you need full-stack unblocking and extraction for arbitrary sites.

Does ReefAPI do automatic extraction like Zyte?

ReefAPI's engines parse their specific sources to stable schemas, and its Web Extract engine covers general pages. Zyte's automatic AI extraction is designed to structure many unfamiliar pages without per-site parsers, which is its edge for broad, changing targets.

Are the Zyte pricing details on this page exact?

No. Zyte's usage-based pricing changes with the features a request uses, so this page keeps it general and links to Zyte for current numbers.

Method

Source notes and hedges

Competitor pricing, quotas, free tiers and feature limits change. This page uses official public pages for product-positioning claims and keeps unstable commercial details general.

  • Zyte homepage: Used for all-in-one scraping and extraction positioning.
  • Zyte API docs: Used for the HTTP, browser and extraction workflow wording; exact prices are not repeated.
Start building

Try the relevant ReefAPI endpoints with 1,000 free credits, or open the docs to inspect params, examples and live proof before wiring them into production.